jump to navigation

Turkey’s ‘zero problems’ problem 18 novembre 2011

Posted by Acturca in Middle East / Moyen Orient, Turkey / Turquie.
Tags: , , , ,
trackback

Today (Singapore) Nov 18, 2011, p. 26          Français  Deutsch  Español 

by Sinan Ulgen *

Ankara must redefine what it means to be a ‘good neighbour’, in a post Arab-Spring Middle East

It was good while it lasted.

Designed by Turkey’s newly elected government in 2002, the country’s « zero problems with neighbours » policy helped it to climb into the league of influential regional powers. The policy’s goal – to build strong economic, political and social ties with the country’s immediate neighbours, while decreasing its dependency on the United States – seemed to be within sight.

But the Arab Spring exposed the policy’s vulnerabilities and Turkey must now seek a new guiding principle for regional engagement.

Until the onset of the Arab uprisings, « zero problems with neighbours » meant zero problems with the Middle East’s established autocratic regimes. But, when Arab political opposition began to gain traction this year, Prime Minister Recep Erdogan’s government faced an unavoidable choice: Whether to maintain its policy of engagement with authoritarian Arab leaders or acknowledge that their countries’ citizens were not having « zero problems ».

The revolt in Libya provided the first concrete challenge to Turkey’s policy. Though Turkey’s Western partners swiftly broke with Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi in support of the opposition, the « zero problems » principle dictated the Turkish government maintain relations with the old regime. After initially adopting a neutral stance, Turkey soon recognised its indecisiveness was damaging its image.

Turkey was thus confronted with a fundamental conflict between its cherished policy of uncritical engagement with regional political rulers and the imperative to support the Libyan people’s democratic aspirations. Eventually, the government decided to support the latter over the former, thus effectively ending its « zero problems with neighbours » policy. Turkey became the last NATO member to give its backing to the Libyan rebels.

In many ways, Syria was the poster child for the « zero problems with neighbours » policy. But the Syrian crisis became another nail in the coffin of Turkey’s regional policy. At the end of the 1990s, Syria and Turkey were on the brink of war, owing to Syria’s support of Kurdish terrorism. But the two governments mended their relationship, even contemplating the creation of a regional common market.

So, when mass protests erupted in Syria in January, Turkey hoped to leverage the relationship of mutual trust that the two countries had presumably developed, actively nudging Syrian President Bashar Al Assad towards democratic reforms. Faced with Mr Assad’s intransigence, however, Mr Erdogan’s government demonstrated that it had learned from its Libyan experience: This time, Turkey did not hesitate before harshly criticising Mr Assad.

In a clear departure from established Turkish policy, Mr Erdogan even imposed unilateral sanctions on Syria – all the more remarkable for a country that has typically condemned sanctions. Indeed, as recently as last year, Turkey voted against new sanctions on Iran at the United Nations Security Council.

At the same time, the Turkish government’s rhetoric also changed. Giving their full-fledged support to the Syrian opposition, Turkey’s leaders started to profess their country’s duty to protect the victimised people of the Middle East. The consequences of this fundamental shift in Turkey’s regional outlook are likely to be profound. After all, Turkey’s new outlook implies that it is intent, for the first time in its history as a republic, on promoting democratic principles in the region.

A more vocal Turkish policy on issues related to fundamental freedoms and democratic reform in the region will necessarily alter Turkey’s relations with its less progressive neighbours. Indeed, if Turkey’s new agenda is to become credible, Mr Erdogan’s government cannot continue to turn a blind eye to the gross human-rights violations in neighbouring Iran, where Mr Erdogan’s government was the first to congratulate President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad following Iran’s tainted elections in 2009.

An equally important component of the new policy’s credibility will be Turkey’s ability to resolve its own democratic shortcomings, particularly with regard to freedom of expression, non-interference with the media and minority rights. Progress in these areas will be critical to the success of Turkey’s foreign-policy agenda.

Turkey’s geopolitical role as a country that is at once European and Middle Eastern is more complex than ever. For such a country, there is no such thing as « no problems ». In an environment that is being reshaped in unpredictable ways by the Arab awakening, Turkey will have to redefine what it means to be a good neighbour.

* Sinan Ulgen is a visiting scholar at Carnegie Europe and the chairman of the Istanbul-based EDAM think-tank.

Commentaires»

No comments yet — be the first.

Laisser un commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:

Logo WordPress.com

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte WordPress.com. Déconnexion / Changer )

Image Twitter

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Twitter. Déconnexion / Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion / Changer )

Photo Google+

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Google+. Déconnexion / Changer )

Connexion à %s

%d blogueurs aiment cette page :